Google Ads / Search and Performance Max
Intent over impressions.
Search and Performance Max, side by side in one account. The row with the larger audience was not the row with the most purchases.
223
Purchases from one Search campaign
- Sector
- E-commerce
- Channels
- Google Ads
- Period
- Reporting period not supplied
- Practice
- Yousef Abdo Founder & Architect
01 / The challenge
The problem behind the brief.
A campaign can produce substantial reach while contributing relatively few purchases. A channel comparison needs to preserve the campaign rows, spend and actual outcomes.
02 / The decisions
Where the work changed.
Compare purchases against cost.
One Search row reports 223 purchases at approximately SAR 11,496 in spend. The Performance Max row beneath it reports 34 purchases at SAR 3,010.41.
Treat impressions as context.
The Performance Max row records 894,157 impressions at a 1.75% interaction rate. That delivery scale is not itself a purchase result.
Read the second Search signal.
Another Search campaign reports 127 purchases and a 22.07% interaction rate. The useful comparison sits at campaign level rather than in a blended impression total.
03 / The outcome
The difference it made.
Two Search campaigns recorded 223 and 127 purchases, alongside a Performance Max campaign with 34. The campaign rows reveal the differences that an impression total would conceal.
- First Search campaign purchases
- 223
- Second Search campaign purchases
- 127
- Second Search interaction rate
- 22.07%
- Compared Performance Max purchases
- 34
04 / The takeaway
Reach earns attention. Intent is tested by what people do after it.
افهم القرارات وراء الأرقام — أدلة ADS.OPS بالعربية ↗
Record context
Google Ads account from Yousef Abdo’s portfolio. Values refer to the individual campaign rows shown in the capture; reporting period unspecified.
From the individual practice of Yousef Abdo, Founder & Architect of ADS.OPS.
